IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Alex Holm Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-06-16 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Metro Jets NA3HL 44 10 13 23 0.523 0.0656 0.0702 0.1650 0.1765
2013-14 Metro Jets NA3HL 48 16 16 32 0.667 0.0837 0.0863 0.2105 0.2170
2014-15 Metro Jets NA3HL 38 10 24 34 0.895 0.1123 0.1103 0.2825 0.2774
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Aurora D3 NCHA — 2 0 0 0 0.000
2015-16 Finlandia D3 — — 15 3 2 5 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.09
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Finlandia
+286.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#33439
Forward overall
#1359
Forward born in 1995
#1362
in NA3HL

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nick Chaoush
Westfield State · 2015-16
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lucas De La Salle
Anna Maria · 2023-24
0.588 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Derrick Brooks
Wisconsin-Superior · 2012-13
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.