← New Search ↗ Social Card

Lucas De La Salle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2004-06-23 Country: Canada
Marian
Verbal NCHA D3

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2023-24 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 53 8 17 25 0.472 0.0908 0.0894 0.2975 0.2930
2024-25 Northern Manitoba Blizzard MJHL 14 2 1 3 0.214 0.0413 0.0384 0.1351 0.1256
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Anna Maria D3 MASCAC FR 17 9 1 10 0.588
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.05
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.59
2025-26 · Anna Maria
+1069.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
60%
Age-Out / Club
8%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#49686
Forward overall
#3408
Forward born in 2004
#1462
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

Marian Alumni similar profiles who attended this school

0.31
actual FR PPG at Marian
0.46
actual FR PPG at Marian
0.00
actual FR PPG at Marian
0.16
actual FR PPG at Marian

D2/3 Comparables

Nichols · 2017-18
0.100 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
King's · 2017-18
0.091 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Cortland · 2022-23
0.214 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.