← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Hyde Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2020-21 NAHL 36 4 5 9 0.250 0.0919 0.0919 0.2639 0.2639
2021-22 Danbury Jr. Hat Tricks NAHL 42 11 7 18 0.429 0.1575 0.1577 0.4524 0.4531
2022-23 NAHL 34 11 9 20 0.588 0.2161 0.2058 0.6208 0.5912
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 32 15 4 19 0.594
2024-25 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 9 0 2 2 0.222
2024-25 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 32 15 4 19 0.594
2023-24 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 14 2 1 3 0.214
2023-24 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 32 15 4 19 0.594
2022-23 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 32 15 4 19 0.594
2021-22 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 32 15 4 19 0.594
2020-21 Stony Brook University ACHA_D1 32 15 4 19 0.594

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
40%
Age-Out / Club
10%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#30647
Forward overall
#1800
Forward born in 2002
#2798
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2006-07
0.621 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Fitchburg State · 2018-19
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Potsdam · 2009-10
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.