IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Matt Amelio Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-06-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Vermont Lumberjacks EHLP 31 10 13 23 0.742 0.0851 0.0806 0.1672 0.1584
2017-18 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 4 0 2 2 0.500 0.1155 0.1105 0.2447 0.2340
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 King's D3 MAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2020-21 King's D3 MAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 King's D1 MAC SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2019-20 King's D3 MAC SO 13 1 1 2 0.154
2018-19 King's D1 MAC FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
2018-19 King's D3 MAC FR 11 0 1 1 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2018-19 · King's
+7.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

12%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#26901
Forward overall
#1224
Forward born in 1997

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alexander June
Becker · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matthew Donnelly
Concordia · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jimmy McCusker
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2009-10
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.