← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Gatto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 14 26 40 0.816 0.4552 0.4552 0.6601 0.6601
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 49 13 14 27 0.551 0.2183 0.2183 0.5785 0.5785
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 17 27 44 0.759 0.3006 0.2851 0.7965 0.7554
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 28 10 9 19 0.679
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 7 13 20 0.769
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 26 5 18 23 0.885
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 26 5 3 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+26.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
5%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14792
Forward overall
#666
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Maine
0.39 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.781 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
New England College · 2018-19
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.