← New Search ↗ Social Card

Connor Gatto Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-06-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Islanders Hockey Club NCDC 49 14 26 40 0.816 0.3328 0.3328 0.6561 0.6561
2020-21 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 49 13 14 27 0.551 0.2024 0.2024 0.5816 0.5816
2021-22 Shreveport Mudbugs NAHL 58 17 27 44 0.759 0.2787 0.2643 0.8007 0.7593
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SR 28 10 9 19 0.679
2024-25 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC JR 26 7 13 20 0.769
2023-24 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC SO 26 5 18 23 0.885
2022-23 SUNY Oswego D3 SUNYAC FR 26 5 3 8 0.308
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.23
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.31
2022-23 · SUNY Oswego
+36.0% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
12%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14126
Forward overall
#657
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.06 PPG
→ Niagara (0.58 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Lawrence · 2022-23
0.760 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Westfield State · 2009-10
1.083 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.