IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dylan Chase Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1994-03-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 43 2 12 14 0.326 0.0706 0.0678 0.2520 0.2420
2014-15 Pembroke Lumber Kings CCHL 54 1 20 21 0.389 0.0844 0.0771 0.3010 0.2751
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 20 1 2 3 0.150
2015-16 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 22 1 4 5 0.227
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.23
2015-16 · Connecticut College
+228.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14666
Defenseman overall
#1746
Defenseman born in 1994
#1226
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Austin Miller
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.963 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Grant Gallo
Nazareth · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Oliver Lester
SUNY Cortland · 2017-18
0.235 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.