IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kamil Tkaczuk Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-02-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 Oakville Blades OJHL 52 9 19 28 0.538 0.1320 0.1321 0.3708 0.3710
2014-15 Oakville Blades OJHL 50 17 22 39 0.780 0.1912 0.1814 0.5370 0.5096
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Middlebury D1 NESCAC SR 25 8 14 22 0.880
2018-19 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SR 25 8 14 22 0.880
2017-18 Middlebury D3 NESCAC JR 24 3 5 8 0.333
2016-17 Middlebury D3 NESCAC SO 21 4 4 8 0.381
2015-16 Middlebury D3 NESCAC FR 17 2 2 4 0.235
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2015-16 · Middlebury
+70.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#27760
Forward overall
#1081
Forward born in 1995
#1368
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Max Barron
Suffolk · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Samuel Lozinski
Albertus Magnus · 2023-24
0.706 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Danny Bagnole
SUNY Geneseo · 2024-25
0.520 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.