IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ian Nichols Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-01-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2010-11 Collingwood Blues OJHL 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2011-12 Caledon Admirals OJHL 40 1 6 7 0.175 0.0489 0.0513 0.1208 0.1268
2012-13 Caledon Admirals OJHL 48 7 5 12 0.250 0.0698 0.0698 0.1725 0.1724
2013-14 Caledon Admirals OJHL 43 9 7 16 0.372 0.1040 0.0987 0.2568 0.2436
2014-15 Caledon Admirals OJHL 45 18 26 44 0.978 0.2732 0.2450 0.6748 0.6053
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2017-18 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 23 1 4 5 0.217
2016-17 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 27 2 4 6 0.222
2015-16 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2015-16 · Hamilton
+108.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#23919
Forward overall
#963
Forward born in 1994
#1952
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Will Suter
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ricky DeRosa
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
Aidan Cavallini
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Perry D'Arrisso
NAHL · 2012-13 · 1.02 PPG
→ Clarkson (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.35 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Braedan Cross
Manhattanville · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Shaun Patry
Salve Regina · 2014-15
0.630 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Adam Bevilacqua
St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.