IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nicholas Fotiu Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-05-24 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 South Shore Kings USPHL-Elite 28 6 7 13 0.464 0.0432 0.0426 0.1063 0.1049
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D1 NE10 SR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2018-19 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SR 17 0 2 2 0.118
2017-18 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 JR 23 4 11 15 0.652
2016-17 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 SO 22 4 5 9 0.409
2015-16 Franklin Pierce D2 NE10 FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#51479
Forward overall
#2258
Forward born in 1995
#784
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tim Faulkner
Aurora · 2015-16
0.684 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Schultz
Aurora · 2022-23
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Evan Lindquist
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2015-16
0.304 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.