IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Patrick DeBlois Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-01-01 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New Hampshire Jr. Monarchs USPHL-Elite 20 4 16 20 1.000 0.1199 0.1219 0.2296 0.2335
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 New England College D3 LittleEast SR 27 4 14 18 0.667
2018-19 New England College D3 LittleEast JR 26 2 9 11 0.423
2017-18 New England College D3 LittleEast SO 26 1 7 8 0.308
2016-17 New England College D3 LittleEast FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2016-17 · New England College
+350.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#17047
Defenseman overall
#2143
Defenseman born in 1996
#538
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Schurhamer
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Maine (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Niklas Folin
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.26 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Sam Piazza
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.16 PPG
→ Michigan (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Eric Sweetman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.39 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Strong D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Evan Cholak
St. Norbert · 2016-17
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ross Sloan
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2012-13
0.529 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Logan Kelly
Canton · 2021-22
0.933 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.