IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jacob Moreau Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-11-18 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 — CCHL 43 10 14 24 0.558 0.1782 0.1688 0.4320 0.4093
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SR 25 6 7 13 0.520
2018-19 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC JR 24 6 10 16 0.667
2017-18 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC SO 25 11 11 22 0.880
2016-17 Connecticut College D3 NESCAC FR 23 4 8 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2016-17 · Connecticut College
+261.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#31699
Forward overall
#1288
Forward born in 1995
#886
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Chad Hennum
Hamline · 2011-12
0.778 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Jeff Oddleifson
Wentworth · 2003-04
0.619 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Austin Wisely
Hamline · 2016-17
0.300 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.