IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Liam Blais Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-09-25 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 39 14 9 23 0.590 0.0994 0.0983 0.2450 0.2424
2015-16 Elliot Lake Vikings NOJHL 40 18 21 39 0.975 0.1644 0.1548 0.4051 0.3814
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SR 29 7 9 16 0.552
2018-19 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen JR 25 1 4 5 0.200
2017-18 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen SO 25 3 6 9 0.360
2016-17 Wisconsin-Superior D3 BigTen FR 28 2 6 8 0.286
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.29
2016-17 · Wisconsin-Superior
+152.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#29991
Forward overall
#1248
Forward born in 1995
#310
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Will Robertson
Lawrence · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Pionk
St. Scholastica · 2016-17
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fleck
Augsburg · 2003-04
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.