IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Robert Neuwirth Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1994-04-19 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 VHK Vsetin U20 USHL-Style-Czech 39 15 13 28 0.718 0.2217 0.2080 0.7667 0.7195
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Westfield State D1 MASCAC SR 26 11 8 19 0.731
2019-20 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SR 26 11 8 19 0.731
2018-19 Westfield State D1 MASCAC JR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2018-19 Westfield State D3 MASCAC JR 25 5 8 13 0.520
2017-18 Westfield State D3 MASCAC SO 23 2 9 11 0.478
2016-17 Westfield State D3 MASCAC FR 22 1 1 2 0.091
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.18
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.09
2016-17 · Westfield State
-48.9% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24334
Forward overall
#948
Forward born in 1994
#224
in USHL-Style-Czech

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Evan Janssen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tanner Pond
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ Northeastern (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Nate Scurfield
Lawrence · 2010-11
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Craig Kitto
Williams · 2009-10
0.846 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Bullard
Canton · 2014-15
0.957 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.