IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mack Stevens Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-05-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Granite City Lumberjacks NA3HL 3 2 0 2 0.667 0.0803 0.0787 0.2106 0.2065
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — JR 15 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Milwaukee School of Engineering D3 — FR 6 1 0 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.07
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · Milwaukee School of Engineering
+124.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Nick
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Army (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cameron McDonald
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.11 PPG
→ Providence (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Nick Neville
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.58 PPG
→ Denver (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Cayemberg
Wisconsin-Stout · 2011-12
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Josh Bliss
Western New England · 2018-19
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Derek Jacobson
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.357 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.