IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Mason Brinich Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-10-04 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Palm Beach Hawks USPHL-Elite 19 3 1 4 0.210 0.0194 0.0205 0.0482 0.0508
2015-16 Hartford Jr. Wolfpack EHL 10 0 2 2 0.200 0.0462 0.0472 0.0979 0.1000
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2017-18 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 0 0 0 0 0.000
2016-17 Salve Regina D3 CNE — 7 1 0 1 0.143
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.03
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.14
2016-17 · Salve Regina
+314.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#24892
Defenseman overall
#2740
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG
Mike Preston
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.07 PPG
→ Army (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Cliff Watson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Michigan Tech (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Zach Lindsay
UMass Boston · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Chrenek
Colby · 2002-03
0.280 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Michael Apreda
Curry · 2012-13
0.191 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.