← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Lindsay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 27 7 6 13 0.481 0.1769 0.1781 0.5089 0.5124
2012-13 Kemptville 73's CCHL 19 2 3 5 0.263 0.0571 0.0534 0.2016 0.1885
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SR 22 4 8 12 0.545
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC JR 30 8 9 17 0.567
2013-14 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#41377
Forward overall
#1553
Forward born in 1992
#4449
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nichols · 2024-25
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Buffalo State · 2023-24
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.