IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Zach Lindsay Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-29 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2011-12 Corpus Christi IceRays NAHL 27 7 6 13 0.481 0.1908 0.1921 0.5055 0.5090
2012-13 Kemptville 73's CCHL 19 2 3 5 0.263 0.0840 0.0785 0.2037 0.1905
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC SR 22 4 8 12 0.545
2015-16 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC JR 30 8 9 17 0.567
2013-14 UMass Boston D3 MASCAC FR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2006-07 Nichols D3 — SR 26 5 5 10 0.385
2005-06 Nichols D3 — SO 16 2 5 7 0.438

NCAAe Rankings

#40869
Forward overall
#1537
Forward born in 1992
#4433
in NAHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Average
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Michael Gershon
SUNY Brockport · 2004-05
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Phil Erickson
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Alfred Rotiroti
Rivier · 2021-22
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.