IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Michael Gershon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1984-10-06 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2004-05 — OJHL 46 7 15 22 0.478 0.1437 0.1310 0.3274 0.2984
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2008-09 SUNY Brockport D3 — SR 27 8 9 17 0.630
2007-08 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 23 3 8 11 0.478
2006-07 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 26 1 4 5 0.192
2005-06 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 25 5 5 10 0.400
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.40
2005-06 · SUNY Brockport
+223.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11276
Defenseman overall
#1081
Defenseman born in 1984
#2815
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.18 No data
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robb Haider
Wisconsin-Stout · 2009-10
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Chris Nathe
Wisconsin-River Falls · 2002-03
0.471 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Ryan Bittner
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.