IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Grant Fuchsen Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 2003-09-25 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2022-23 Spruce Grove Saints AJHL 41 4 11 15 0.366 0.1227 0.1217 0.3386 0.3358
2023-24 Drayton Valley Thunder AJHL 38 3 11 14 0.368 0.1236 0.1167 0.3409 0.3220
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Williams D3 NESCAC SO 26 2 6 8 0.308
2024-25 Williams D3 NESCAC — 23 2 10 12 0.522
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2024-25 · Williams
+365.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
18%
NCAA D2/D3
52%
Age-Out / Club
15%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14039
Defenseman overall
#2696
Defenseman born in 2003
#1652
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

Patrick Koudys
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ RPI (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Kirk
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.32 PPG
→ Dartmouth
0.17 No data
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Nolan Valleau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

David Becker
Bethel · 2014-15
0.286 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Trevor John
Tufts · 2008-09
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Jamieson
Marian · 2012-13
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.