← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brodie Jamieson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Coquitlam Express BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Coquitlam Express BCHL 57 5 9 14 0.246 0.0956 0.1040 0.3582 0.3895
2010-11 BCHL 56 7 19 26 0.464 0.1807 0.1880 0.6771 0.7045
2011-12 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 28 9 9 18 0.643 0.2147 0.2126 0.5968 0.5909
2012-13 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 58 18 18 36 0.621 0.2073 0.1946 0.5762 0.5409
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 7 11 18 0.667
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA JR 17 5 9 14 0.824
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 4 12 16 0.593
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2013-14 · Marian
+200.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#25904
Forward overall
#1131
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.