← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brodie Jamieson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1992-09-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2008-09 Coquitlam Express BCHL 3 0 0 0 0.000
2009-10 Coquitlam Express BCHL 57 5 9 14 0.246 0.0946 0.1029 0.3574 0.3886
2010-11 BCHL 56 7 19 26 0.464 0.1789 0.1861 0.6757 0.7031
2011-12 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 28 9 9 18 0.643 0.2156 0.2135 0.5949 0.5890
2012-13 Drumheller Dragons AJHL 58 18 18 36 0.621 0.2082 0.1955 0.5744 0.5393
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Marian D3 NCHA SR 27 7 11 18 0.667
2015-16 Marian D3 NCHA JR 17 5 9 14 0.824
2014-15 Marian D3 NCHA SO 27 4 12 16 0.593
2013-14 Marian D3 NCHA FR 27 5 9 14 0.518
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.52
2013-14 · Marian
+198.8% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#35323
Forward overall
#1339
Forward born in 1992

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.93 PPG
→ Nebraska Omaha (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.32 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Elmira · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Scholastica · 2009-10
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stout · 2013-14
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.