← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Chrenek Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1983-03-21 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 45 3 6 9 0.200 0.0671 0.0716 0.1851 0.1974
2001-02 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 61 9 8 17 0.279 0.0935 0.0944 0.2579 0.2603
2002-03 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 48 5 12 17 0.354 0.1188 0.1175 0.3278 0.3242
2003-04 Grande Prairie Storm AJHL 58 7 17 24 0.414 0.1388 0.1263 0.3829 0.3484
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 Colby D3 NESCAC SR 25 3 7 10 0.400
2006-07 Colby D3 NESCAC JR 25 7 12 19 0.760
2005-06 Colby D3 NESCAC SO 22 7 4 11 0.500
2004-05 Colby D3 NESCAC FR 25 1 6 7 0.280
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.28
2004-05 · Colby
+141.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#14170
Defenseman overall
#1171
Defenseman born in 1983
#1663
in AJHL

D1 Comparables

QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

St. Norbert · 2008-09
0.533 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Morrisville · 2021-22
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.