← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colby Walters Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-03-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 46 4 4 8 0.174 0.0373 0.0373 0.0852 0.0852
2020-21 New York Apple Core EHL 33 5 10 15 0.455 0.0975 0.0975 0.2226 0.2226
2021-22 New York Apple Core EHL 46 17 23 40 0.870 0.1866 0.1783 0.4258 0.4069
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2024-25 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC JR 25 0 1 1 0.040
2023-24 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2022-23 Morrisville D3 SUNYAC FR 3 0 0 0 0.000

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

55%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32605
Forward overall
#1346
Forward born in 2001
#761
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Hobart · 2016-17
0.750 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Lebanon Valley · 2004-05
0.909 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
St. Thomas · 2009-10
0.593 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.