← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Pizzimenti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 35 5 14 19 0.543 0.0654 0.0654 0.1715 0.1715
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 38 21 24 45 1.184 0.1427 0.1427 0.3741 0.3741
2021-22 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 21 25 46 1.046 0.1407 0.1307 0.3559 0.3306
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2024-25 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2023-24 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2022-23 Concordia Wisconsin D3 NCHA FR 26 4 5 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Concordia
+197.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

42%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32622
Forward overall
#1348
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.71 PPG
→ Penn State (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.