← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ben Pizzimenti Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-04-10 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Northeast Generals NA3HL 35 5 14 19 0.543 0.0681 0.0681 0.1714 0.1714
2020-21 Northeast Generals NA3HL 38 21 24 45 1.184 0.1486 0.1486 0.3739 0.3739
2021-22 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Premier 44 21 25 46 1.046 0.1368 0.1271 0.3548 0.3296
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Concordia D3 MIAC GR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2024-25 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA JR 7 1 0 1 0.143
2023-24 Concordia D3 MIAC SR 22 0 1 1 0.045
2023-24 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA SO 22 0 1 1 0.045
2022-23 Concordia D3 MIAC JR 27 4 5 9 0.333
2022-23 Concordia (WI) D3 NCHA FR 26 4 5 9 0.346
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2022-23 · Concordia
+206.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#18937
Forward overall
#896
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Trinity · 2016-17
0.518 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Wesleyan · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.