← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gino Colangelo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Collingwood Blues OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0817 0.0817 0.2295 0.2295
2020-21 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 54 6 14 20 0.370 0.0803 0.0776 0.2866 0.2771
2022-23 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 50 14 33 47 0.940 0.2039 0.1880 0.7273 0.6706
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 17 1 5 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+186.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
38%
Age-Out / Club
20%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24736
Forward overall
#1378
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Gustavus Adolphus · 2017-18
0.412 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2004-05
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.