← New Search ↗ Social Card

Gino Colangelo Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-04-12 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Collingwood Blues OJHL 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0931 0.0931 0.2300 0.2300
2020-21 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 0 0 0 0 0.000
2021-22 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 54 6 14 20 0.370 0.1057 0.1022 0.2867 0.2772
2022-23 Carleton Place Canadians CCHL 50 14 33 47 0.940 0.2683 0.2474 0.7277 0.6709
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC JR 24 1 5 6 0.250
2024-25 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC SO 18 1 5 6 0.333
2023-24 Wisconsin-Stevens Point D3 WIAC FR 17 1 5 6 0.353
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2023-24 · Wisconsin-Stevens Point
+117.7% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D1
35%
NCAA D2/D3
48%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#20086
Forward overall
#774
Forward born in 2002

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alaska Anchorage (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aurora · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Elmira · 2004-05
0.786 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2023-24
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.