IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Nick Grose Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-04-12 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2013-14 North Bay Trappers NOJHL 41 3 0 3 0.073 0.0122 0.0125 0.0305 0.0313
2014-15 Mattawa Blackhawks NOJHL 52 4 33 37 0.712 0.1188 0.1148 0.2962 0.2863
2015-16 Powassan VooDoos NOJHL 54 12 35 47 0.870 0.1454 0.1336 0.3623 0.3328
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2016-17 Utica D3 UCHC — 6 0 1 1 0.167
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.17
2016-17 · Utica
+40.1% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#10623
Defenseman overall
#1497
Defenseman born in 1995
#572
in NOJHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Robert Flannery
SUNY Brockport · 2017-18
0.318 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Gino Colangelo
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2022-23
0.353 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Luke Rodgers
Endicott · 2014-15
0.571 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.