| Season | Team | League | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG | NCAAe-PPG | Age-Adj | D3e-PPG | Age-Adj |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014-15 | — | EHL | 19 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.210 | 0.0452 | 0.0442 | 0.1031 | 0.1009 |
| 2015-16 | Express Hockey Club | EHL | 25 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 0.160 | 0.0343 | 0.0321 | 0.0784 | 0.0733 |
| Season | School | Div | Conference | Year | GP | G | A | Pts | PPG |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-18 | Finlandia | D3 | — | SO | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
| 2016-17 | Finlandia | D3 | — | FR | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.000 |
How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.
Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.