IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Chase Wiedemann Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-01-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Jersey Hitmen USPHL-Elite 42 3 12 15 0.357 0.0266 0.0271 0.0818 0.0833
2015-16 Rochester Jr. Americans USPHL-Premier-Classic 27 2 2 4 0.148 0.0416 0.0411 0.1218 0.1205
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 8 0 1 1 0.125
2018-19 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 20 1 2 3 0.150
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 20 1 2 3 0.150
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 5 1 1 2 0.400
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 4 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#57665
Forward overall
#2823
Forward born in 1996
#1317
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG
Matthew Hansen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.25 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.17 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josh Simpson
SUNY Oswego · 2022-23
0.269 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Sterling Wolters
SUNY Geneseo · 2021-22
0.240 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Andrew Simmons
SUNY Brockport · 2006-07
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.