IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordan Boehlke Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1996-09-03 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Northern Cyclones EHL 1 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 21 1 1 2 0.095 0.0139 0.0141 0.0466 0.0474
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Lawrence D1 ECAC SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2019-20 Lawrence D3 NCHA SR 25 2 5 7 0.280
2018-19 Lawrence D1 ECAC JR 22 1 0 1 0.045
2018-19 Lawrence D3 NCHA JR 22 1 0 1 0.045
2017-18 Lawrence D3 NCHA SO 26 2 1 3 0.115
2016-17 Lawrence D3 NCHA FR 9 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#52282
Forward overall
#2468
Forward born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Conor Andrle
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.20 PPG
→ Army (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Average
NCAAe PPG
Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Hynes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.28 PPG
→ Union (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Carmine Taffo
Trine · 2015-16
0.261 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Jake Lindstrom
UMass Boston · 2023-24
0.316 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Lloyd Hayes
Endicott · 2014-15
0.385 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.