IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Trey Sauder Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2003-07-24 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 46 5 12 17 0.370 0.1046 0.1086 0.2329 0.2418
2022-23 Swan Valley Stampeders MJHL 58 24 36 60 1.034 0.2927 0.2902 0.6518 0.6462
2023-24 — MJHL 58 21 31 52 0.897 0.2536 0.2381 0.5649 0.5304
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2024-25 Wisconsin-Superior D3 WIAC FR 9 1 2 3 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.22
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2024-25 · Wisconsin-Superior
+50.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
38%
NCAA D2/D3
35%
Age-Out / Club
0%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16470
Forward overall
#636
Forward born in 2003
#355
in MJHL

D1 Comparables

Jayson Angus
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cody Marooney
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Clint Carlisle
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.78 PPG
→ Army (0.52 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jake McKenelly
Wentworth · 2017-18
0.769 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Brandon Fackey
New England College · 2004-05
0.792 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Kenny Matheson
Hamilton · 2011-12
0.889 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.