IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Kayser Raei Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-10-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Express Hockey Club EHL 46 18 38 56 1.217 0.4284 0.4404 0.5969 0.6137
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Stonehill D1 AHA JR 26 9 19 28 1.077
2019-20 Stonehill D2 NE10 — 26 9 19 28 1.077
2018-19 Stonehill D1 AHA SO 13 6 5 11 0.846
2018-19 Stonehill D2 NE10 — 13 6 5 11 0.846
2017-18 Skidmore D3 SUNYAC — 16 4 4 8 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.38
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2017-18 · Skidmore
+32.6% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7615
Forward overall
#349
Forward born in 1997
#63
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Robbie Baillargeon
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ Boston University (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Trevor Olson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.16 D1 FR PPG)
0.48 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Logan Nelson
WHL · 2012-13 · 0.88 PPG
→ Wisconsin-Stout (0.59 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Villiam Haag
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ Michigan (0.37 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Joe Gambardella
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.75 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.45 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Maxwell Reavis
UMass Boston · 2010-11
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Billy Collins
Amherst · 2000-01
0.440 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Richard Manley
SUNY Geneseo · 2008-09
1.150 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.