IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Spencer Segui Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-02-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 — USPHL-Premier-Classic 34 0 1 1 0.029 0.0083 0.0087 0.0242 0.0253
2015-16 Timmins Rock NOJHL 6 0 2 2 0.333 0.0557 0.0536 0.1388 0.1335
2016-17 Timmins Rock NOJHL 47 5 25 30 0.638 0.1066 0.0974 0.2657 0.2428
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2018-19 Fitchburg State D1 MASCAC SO 5 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 5 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Fitchburg State D3 MASCAC — 18 2 4 6 0.333
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.08
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.33
2017-18 · Fitchburg State
+342.0% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#19074
Defenseman overall
#2305
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.09 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.04 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Gabe Randel
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2024-25
0.800 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Tyler Schwindt
Elmira · 2021-22
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Tommy McDonough
Hobart · 2024-25
0.273 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.