IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Williams Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-21 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 37 4 8 12 0.324 0.1141 0.1135 0.1590 0.1581
2016-17 Philadelphia Jr. Flyers EHL 20 1 10 11 0.550 0.1935 0.1836 0.2697 0.2560
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Lake Superior State D1 WCHA FR 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 SUNY Brockport D3 — JR 21 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 SUNY Brockport D3 — SO 17 1 0 1 0.059
2017-18 SUNY Brockport D3 — FR 10 0 2 2 0.200
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.20
2017-18 · SUNY Brockport
+36.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#9618
Defenseman overall
#1487
Defenseman born in 1996
#1257
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew McCormack
Manhattanville · 2024-25
0.375 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Nick Rutigliano
Hamilton · 2016-17
0.680 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Eddie Shepler
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2023-24
0.560 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.