IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jan Senkerik Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-07-07 Country: Czechia
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 Wisconsin Rapids Riverkings USPHL-Elite 42 5 25 30 0.714 0.0659 0.0651 0.1636 0.1617
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2020-21 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Manhattanville D3 UCHC JR 10 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Manhattanville D3 UCHC SO 4 0 0 0 0.000
2017-18 Manhattanville D3 UCHC FR 0 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#13484
Defenseman overall
#2020
Defenseman born in 1997
#358
in USPHL-Elite

D1 Comparables

James Roll
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.22 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Dan Molenaar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Neal Goff
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Christian Neumann
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.29 PPG
→ UConn (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Joe Schuldt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Michigan Tech
0.05 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Shawn O'Malley
Aurora · 2016-17
0.696 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Charles Barber
Buffalo State · 2014-15
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Dawson Ellis
Adrian · 2018-19
0.429 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.