IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Charles Barber Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1995-07-20 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 New York Bobcats EHL 40 7 6 13 0.325 0.0751 0.0755 0.1590 0.1598
2015-16 New York Bobcats EHL 35 12 12 24 0.686 0.1584 0.1522 0.3355 0.3223
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Buffalo State D1 SUNYAC SR 26 6 7 13 0.500
2019-20 Buffalo State D3 SUNYAC — 26 6 7 13 0.500
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC GR 24 3 1 4 0.167
2017-18 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC SR 21 1 7 8 0.381
2016-17 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 SUNYAC JR 21 0 9 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2016-17 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+273.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7627
Defenseman overall
#1197
Defenseman born in 1995
#942
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Matt Krug
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
William Eiserman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Benjamin Gallacher
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Mitchell Snider
Manhattanville · 2011-12
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Jakub Hall
SUNY Potsdam · 2022-23
0.360 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Whelan
Framingham State · 2017-18
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.