← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jakub Hall Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2002-07-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2021-22 Carolina Jr. Hurricanes USPHL-Premier 37 16 20 36 0.973 0.1310 0.1302 0.3312 0.3292
2022-23 Richmond Generals USPHL-Premier 39 17 18 35 0.897 0.1208 0.1141 0.3055 0.2887
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC JR 22 7 3 10 0.455
2024-25 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC SO 26 6 4 10 0.385
2023-24 SUNY Potsdam D3 SUNYAC FR 25 5 4 9 0.360
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.10
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.36
2023-24 · SUNY Potsdam
+248.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

35%
NCAA D2/D3
2%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#32438
Forward overall
#1456
Forward born in 2002
#1087
in USPHL-Premier

D1 Comparables

NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.66 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.65 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.48 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Finlandia · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Southern Maine · 2021-22
0.333 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Utica · 2014-15
0.294 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.