IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Daniel Condon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1996-03-26 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 New York Apple Core EHL 33 0 2 2 0.061 0.0213 0.0212 0.0297 0.0296
2016-17 Atlanta Kings USPHL-Elite 24 2 10 12 0.500 0.0878 0.0811 0.1145 0.1058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Bryn Athyn D3 — JR 2 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Bryn Athyn D3 — SO 11 1 0 1 0.091
2017-18 Bryn Athyn D3 — FR 12 0 0 0 0.000

NCAAe Rankings

#25246
Defenseman overall
#2766
Defenseman born in 1996

D1 Comparables

Marc-Antoine Carrier
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Brown (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.16 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Carter Foguth
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.08 PPG
→ Minnesota (0.06 D1 FR PPG)
0.05 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Michael Holland
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.18 PPG
→ RIT (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Brandon Carlson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Dominic Racobaldo
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ American International (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Aaron Carmichael
Southern Maine · 2014-15
0.133 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Kieran Ronan
Concordia (WI) · 2024-25
0.250 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Corey Robertson
Trine · 2016-17
0.478 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.