IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Ryan Kuhn Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1995-01-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2012-13 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 3 0 2 2 0.667 0.1634 0.1714 0.4564 0.4787
2013-14 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 51 12 20 32 0.627 0.1538 0.1535 0.4295 0.4286
2014-15 Buffalo Jr. Sabres OJHL 52 27 23 50 0.962 0.2357 0.2230 0.6581 0.6227
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2019-20 Plattsburgh D1 — SR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2019-20 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2018-19 Plattsburgh D1 — SR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2018-19 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 26 4 9 13 0.500
2017-18 Niagara D1 AHA JR 20 0 1 1 0.050
2016-17 Niagara D1 AHA SO 9 0 2 2 0.222
2015-16 Niagara D1 AHA FR 30 1 8 9 0.300
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2015-16 · Niagara
+79.5% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#21433
Forward overall
#805
Forward born in 1995
#912
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Siiro
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Princeton (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Average
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Steven Sleep
St. Norbert · 2003-04
0.516 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Carlos Fornaris
New England College · 2014-15
1.115 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jason Fransky
Elmira · 2005-06
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.