IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jordi Jefferson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-01-06 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Brockville Braves CCHL 62 16 27 43 0.694 0.1504 0.1429 0.5312 0.5048
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SR 21 6 11 17 0.809
2020-21 Hamilton D3 NESCAC JR 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hamilton D1 NESCAC SO 26 12 7 19 0.731
2019-20 Hamilton D3 NESCAC SO 26 12 7 19 0.731
2018-19 Hamilton D1 NESCAC FR 18 5 4 9 0.500
2018-19 Hamilton D3 NESCAC FR 18 5 4 9 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Hamilton
+308.8% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

25%
NCAA D1
15%
NCAA D2/D3
20%
Age-Out / Club
40%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#25608
Forward overall
#1264
Forward born in 1998
#522
in CCHL

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Scott Cuthrell
Nichols · 2013-14
0.704 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Max Barron
Suffolk · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Jon Hansen
St. Scholastica · 2017-18
0.455 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.