IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler McGregor Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-05-01 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Ajax Axemen OJHL 48 23 45 68 1.417 0.3472 0.3570 0.9743 1.0017
2001-02 Ajax Axemen OJHL 49 29 48 77 1.571 0.3852 0.3761 1.0807 1.0552
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Holy Cross D1 AHA SR 38 26 28 54 1.421
2004-05 Holy Cross D1 AHA JR 35 21 13 34 0.971
2003-04 Holy Cross D1 AHA SO 35 10 10 20 0.571
2002-03 Holy Cross D1 AHA FR 35 13 16 29 0.829
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.32
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.83
2002-03 · Holy Cross
+162.7% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#7121
Forward overall
#256
Forward born in 1983
#57
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Brandon Hawkins
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.97 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Drew Smolcynski
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.69 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.41 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ray Pigozzi
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.64 PPG
→ UMass (0.55 D1 FR PPG)
0.38 Average
NCAAe PPG
Christian Heil
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.62 PPG
→ Colorado College (0.04 D1 FR PPG)
0.36 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Daniel Milne
OHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Michigan
0.40 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Tyler Braccini
Bethel · 2019-20
0.727 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Parker Mismash
St. Scholastica · 2014-15
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Connor Armour
Adrian · 2012-13
1.357 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.