IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Tyler Braccini Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2001-07-02 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2019-20 Buffalo USHS-MN 26 20 18 38 1.462 0.1850 0.1850 0.3550 0.3550
2020-21 Northwest Express USPHL-Premier 37 31 32 63 1.703 0.2227 0.2227 — —
2021-22 — NAHL 47 5 8 13 0.277 0.1016 0.0967 0.2920 0.2778
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2025-26 Bethel D3 MIAC SR 26 17 13 30 1.154
2024-25 Bethel D3 MIAC JR 26 19 11 30 1.154
2023-24 Bethel D3 MIAC SO 26 11 8 19 0.731
2022-23 Bethel D3 MIAC FR 22 10 6 16 0.727
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.11
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.73
2022-23 · Bethel
+543.6% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

22%
NCAA D1
8%
NCAA D2/D3
68%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#14483
Forward overall
#676
Forward born in 2001

D1 Comparables

Eli Lichtenwald
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.36 PPG
→ Union (0.68 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Yasin Cissé
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Eric Johansson
Endicott · 2018-19
0.545 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Faiz Khan
UMass Boston · 2010-11
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Race Bennett
Salem State · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.