← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Lebel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Wolves EHL 44 10 10 20 0.455 0.1050 0.1106 0.2224 0.2343
2017-18 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 21 29 50 1.111 0.2567 0.2562 0.5437 0.5426
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 24 6 1 7 0.292
2020-21 Lake Forest D1 NCHA JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Lake Forest D1 NCHA SO 25 10 7 17 0.680
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 25 10 7 17 0.680
2018-19 Lake Forest D1 NCHA FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.17
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2018-19 · Lake Forest
+47.5% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

8%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
57%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#16709
Forward overall
#782
Forward born in 1998
#292
in EHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Denver (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.85 PPG
→ Miami (0.71 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Strong
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.51 PPG
→ Cornell (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Adrian · 2015-16
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Skidmore · 2024-25
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.