IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Will Lebel Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-04-23 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2016-17 New England Wolves EHL 44 10 10 20 0.455 0.0975 0.1027 0.2226 0.2345
2017-18 Express Hockey Club EHL 45 21 29 50 1.111 0.2384 0.2379 0.5441 0.5430
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SR 24 6 1 7 0.292
2020-21 Lake Forest D3 NCHA JR 5 1 0 1 0.200
2019-20 Lake Forest D3 NCHA SO 25 10 7 17 0.680
2018-19 Lake Forest D3 NCHA FR 24 3 3 6 0.250
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.16
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.25
2018-19 · Lake Forest
+58.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

38%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
60%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#22820
Forward overall
#919
Forward born in 1998
#276
in EHL

D1 Comparables

Tommy Schutt
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.37 PPG
→ Quinnipiac (0.28 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Bauman
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.70 PPG
→ Bemidji State (0.53 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Average
NCAAe PPG
Sami Salminen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.56 PPG
→ Northern Michigan (0.34 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Poulsen
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.60 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.21 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Jackson Arcan
SUNY Oswego · 2018-19
0.647 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Thomas Magnavite
Saint Mary's · 2018-19
0.222 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brodie Tutton
SUNY Geneseo · 2013-14
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.