← New Search ↗ Social Card

Dorian Overland Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1997-03-09 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2014-15 Collingwood Blues OJHL 13 1 0 1 0.077 0.0188 0.0198 0.0529 0.0557
2015-16 Wellington Dukes OJHL 10 2 2 4 0.400 0.0980 0.0978 0.2754 0.2748
2016-17 Collingwood Blues OJHL 51 19 17 36 0.706 0.1730 0.1649 0.4860 0.4632
2017-18 Collingwood Blues OJHL 52 16 25 41 0.788 0.1933 0.1749 0.5429 0.4913
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2021-22 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SR 6 2 1 3 0.500
2019-20 Cortland D1 SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2019-20 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 6 1 0 1 0.167
2018-19 Cortland D1 FR 19 1 3 4 0.210
2018-19 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 19 1 3 4 0.210
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.15
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.21
2018-19 · Cortland
+43.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

40%
NCAA D1
12%
NCAA D2/D3
45%
Age-Out / Club
2%
Pro / Other

NCAAe Rankings

#28081
Forward overall
#1280
Forward born in 1997
#1392
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
QMJHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Boston University
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.47 PPG
→ Bentley (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.59 PPG
→ Minnesota State (0.22 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Developing
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Brown (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Castleton · 2015-16
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
UMass Dartmouth · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Trinity · 2024-25
0.583 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.