← New Search ↗ Social Card

Sky Silverstein Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1997-08-30 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2015-16 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Elite 14 0 1 1 0.071 0.0066 0.0070 0.0164 0.0173
2016-17 P.A.L. Junior Islanders USPHL-Elite 3 0 1 1 0.333 0.0308 0.0307 0.0763 0.0760
2017-18 P.A.L. Junior Islanders NCDC 50 6 21 27 0.540 0.2202 0.2111 0.4341 0.4161
Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 26 9 10 19 0.731
2021-22 UMass Dartmouth D3 HockeyEast SR 13 1 3 4 0.308
2019-20 Endicott D1 CNE SO 3 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Endicott D3 CNE 3 0 0 0 0.000
2018-19 Endicott D1 CNE FR 4 0 2 2 0.500
2018-19 Endicott D3 CNE 4 0 2 2 0.500
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
Actual FR PPG
0.50
2018-19 · Endicott
+281.1% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

18%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#6897
Defenseman overall
#1309
Defenseman born in 1997

D1 Comparables

USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Ohio State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.24 Elite D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Union (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.11 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.41 PPG
→ Bowling Green
0.22 No data
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.15 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.08 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.24 PPG
→ Alabama-Huntsville (0.11 D1 FR PPG)
0.13 Developing D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Saint Anselm · 2023-24
0.480 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
SUNY Plattsburgh · 2009-10
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Concordia · 2021-22
0.320 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.