IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

C.J. Thompson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-11-07 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2000-01 Wellington Dukes OJHL 11 1 1 2 0.182 0.0508 0.0535 0.1255 0.1323
2001-02 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 18 25 43 0.896 0.2503 0.2509 0.6182 0.6197
2002-03 Wellington Dukes OJHL 40 21 27 48 1.200 0.3353 0.3222 0.8281 0.7959
2003-04 Wellington Dukes OJHL 48 15 31 46 0.958 0.2677 0.2452 0.6613 0.6058
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2007-08 SUNY Oswego D3 — SR 26 10 6 16 0.615
2006-07 SUNY Oswego D3 — JR 29 14 12 26 0.897
2005-06 SUNY Oswego D3 — SO 27 13 25 38 1.407
2004-05 SUNY Oswego D3 — FR 27 6 2 8 0.296
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.24
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.30
2004-05 · SUNY Oswego
+25.4% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#11600
Forward overall
#446
Forward born in 1983
#588
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ian Miller
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Ryan Doucet
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.73 PPG
→ Air Force (0.10 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.23 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Cody Smith
Norwich · 2008-09
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Jordan Singer
Wisconsin-Eau Claire · 2008-09
0.682 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Gage Dill
Curry · 2021-22
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.