IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Colin Philippon Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-02-19 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Boston Jr. Bruins USPHL-Premier 42 11 8 19 0.452 0.0594 0.0607 0.1536 0.1570
2018-19 Vermont Lumberjacks EHL 43 16 21 37 0.861 0.1988 0.1967 0.4210 0.4165
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Assumption D2 NE10 — 32 11 19 30 0.938
2021-22 Assumption D2 NE10 — 27 11 5 16 0.593
2019-20 Assumption D1 NE10 FR 21 4 5 9 0.429
2019-20 Assumption D2 NE10 — 21 4 5 9 0.429
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.12
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.43
2019-20 · Assumption
+251.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

28%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
28%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#23551
Forward overall
#1187
Forward born in 1999

D1 Comparables

Alexander Dahl
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.21 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Gage Hough
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.39 PPG
→ UMass Lowell (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Barry Kneedler
Neumann · 2015-16
1.125 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Cameron Sangster
Becker · 2016-17
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Leo Stolpe
Plymouth State · 2016-17
0.870 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.