IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Demitrios Stefanou Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1998-11-09 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 35 3 10 13 0.371 0.1514 0.1542 0.2985 0.3040
2018-19 Connecticut Jr. Rangers NCDC 38 5 9 14 0.368 0.1502 0.1444 0.2961 0.2846
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Western New England D3 CNE — 24 1 10 11 0.458
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE — 19 4 4 8 0.421
2019-20 Western New England D1 CNE FR 23 5 3 8 0.348
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE — 23 5 3 8 0.348
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.35
2019-20 · Western New England
+173.9% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

15%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
0%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24611
Forward overall
#1193
Forward born in 1998
#874
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Cullen Hurley
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.38 PPG
→ Wisconsin
0.21 No data
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Deresky
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.79 PPG
→ Bentley (0.19 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Max Birkinbine
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Air Force (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Woody Hudson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ St. Lawrence (0.30 D1 FR PPG)
0.23 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

C.J. Thompson
SUNY Oswego · 2003-04
0.296 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Bryan Zurowski
SUNY Geneseo · 2018-19
0.267 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Nate Rogers
Milwaukee School of Engineering · 2016-17
0.500 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.