IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Brenden Howell Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 2000-10-23 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 Rochester Monarchs USPHL-Premier 36 15 19 34 0.944 0.1065 0.1178 0.3206 0.3545
2018-19 Rochester Monarchs NCDC 48 15 24 39 0.812 0.1878 0.1989 0.6547 0.6933
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SR 20 6 6 12 0.600
2021-22 Hobart D3 SUNYAC JR 20 4 4 8 0.400
2020-21 Hobart D3 SUNYAC SO 0 0 0 0 0.000
2019-20 Hobart D1 SUNYAC FR 22 5 2 7 0.318
2019-20 Hobart D3 SUNYAC FR 22 5 2 7 0.318
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.14
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.32
2019-20 · Hobart
+123.3% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
82%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#9433
Forward overall
#395
Forward born in 2000

D1 Comparables

Ian Mansfield
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Army (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.14 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.26 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Gaudreau
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Boston College (0.12 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.27 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ashton Collazo
Framingham State · 2018-19
0.600 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Mike Collins
Elmira · 2009-10
1.000 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
Anthony Principato
Wentworth · 2006-07
1.389 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.