IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

John D'Aniello Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1999-07-13 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2017-18 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 5 0 0 0 0.000 — — — —
2018-19 New Jersey Rockets NCDC 49 7 11 18 0.367 0.1497 0.1489 0.2952 0.2937
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Western New England D3 CNE — 26 8 11 19 0.731
2021-22 Western New England D3 CNE — 26 2 9 11 0.423
2019-20 Western New England D1 CNE FR 25 3 3 6 0.240
2019-20 Western New England D3 CNE — 25 3 3 6 0.240
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.13
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.24
2019-20 · Western New England
+88.2% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

5%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
50%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#24816
Forward overall
#1257
Forward born in 1999
#880
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Josh Erickson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.14 D1 FR PPG)
0.12 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Zach Saar
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Penn State (0.33 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tyler Spezia
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.26 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Matt Pohlkamp
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.33 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.41 D1 FR PPG)
0.19 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Greiner
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.17 PPG
→ Bowling Green (0.38 D1 FR PPG)
0.10 Average
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Alex Coles
St. Thomas · 2005-06
0.400 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Tanner Bowditch
Elmira · 2014-15
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Stendahl
Wisconsin-Stevens Point · 2003-04
0.615 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.