IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Greg McGunigle Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Defense DOB: 1999-07-18 Country: USA
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2018-19 Utica Jr. Comets NCDC 48 16 15 31 0.646 0.2633 0.2621 0.5191 0.5168
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2022-23 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 26 3 7 10 0.385
2021-22 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 21 2 2 4 0.191
2019-20 Amherst D1 NESCAC FR 20 1 2 3 0.150
2019-20 Amherst D3 NESCAC — 20 1 2 3 0.150
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.25
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.15
2019-20 · Amherst
-39.4% vs. projection

College Pathway Likelihood (based on 40 comparables)

10%
NCAA D2/D3
0%
Club / ACHA
48%
Other

NCAAe Rankings

#1872
Defenseman overall
#423
Defenseman born in 1999
#247
in NCDC

D1 Comparables

Niklas Nevalainen
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.55 PPG
→ St. Cloud State (0.23 D1 FR PPG)
0.31 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Mike McKee
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.50 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.05 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing D
NCAAe PPG
Tucker Poolman
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.44 PPG
→ North Dakota (0.45 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Strong D
NCAAe PPG
Tommy Davis
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Princeton (0.29 D1 FR PPG)
0.20 Average D
NCAAe PPG
Christopher Dienes
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Western Michigan (0.15 D1 FR PPG)
0.25 Average D
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Josiah Matuszewski
Bethel · 2002-03
0.875 Strong
actual D2/3 PPG
Martin Kapoian
Elmira · 2017-18
0.444 Average
actual D2/3 PPG
Matt Salmon
SUNY Morrisville · 2007-08
0.577 Average
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.