IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Bryant Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1983-09-29 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 North York Rangers OJHL 49 18 25 43 0.878 0.2452 0.2445 0.6056 0.6038
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SR 15 2 0 2 0.133
2004-05 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — JR 29 3 7 10 0.345
2003-04 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — SO 29 7 14 21 0.724
2002-03 SUNY Plattsburgh D3 — FR 29 8 5 13 0.448
Pre-College Projection vs. Actual Freshman Year
Projected PPG
0.21
before college
→
Actual FR PPG
0.45
2002-03 · SUNY Plattsburgh
+114.2% vs. projection

NCAAe Rankings

#15096
Forward overall
#548
Forward born in 1983
#930
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Thomas Ebbing
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.45 PPG
→ Michigan State (0.25 D1 FR PPG)
0.29 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Brady Ferguson
NAHL · 2012-13 · 0.57 PPG
→ Robert Morris (0.76 D1 FR PPG)
0.22 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Kyle Osterberg
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.52 PPG
→ Minnesota Duluth (0.77 D1 FR PPG)
0.34 Strong
NCAAe PPG
Mitch Hults
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.46 PPG
→ Lake Superior State (0.50 D1 FR PPG)
0.30 Average
NCAAe PPG
Jake Horton
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.43 PPG
→ Harvard (0.24 D1 FR PPG)
0.28 Developing
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Ross Olsson
Endicott · 2012-13
1.364 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG
John Barrett
Wilkes · 2017-18
0.000 No data
actual D2/3 PPG
Alex Botten
SUNY Oswego · 2010-11
1.133 Elite
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.