IcePath icepath.io · Hockey Analytics
← New Search ↗ Social Card

Jason Wilson Elite Prospects ↗

Position: Forward DOB: 1981-01-31 Country: Canada
No commitment set

Set Commitment

NCAA Division I

NCAA D3 / D2

Career Trajectory
Dashed = raw PPG  ·  ■ Solid blue = age-adjusted NCAAe-PPG  ·  ■ Green = actual college PPG
Junior Seasons
Season Team League GP G A Pts PPG NCAAe-PPG Age-Adj D3e-PPG Age-Adj
2001-02 — OJHL 27 1 3 4 0.148 0.0363 0.0314 0.1020 0.0881
■ Blue = NCAAe (D1 anchor)   ■ Green = D3e (D3 anchor)   COVID-flagged seasons highlighted in yellow
College Seasons (Historical)
Season School Div Conference Year GP G A Pts PPG
2005-06 Norwich D3 LittleEast SR 13 3 6 9 0.692
2004-05 Norwich D3 LittleEast JR 26 6 3 9 0.346
2003-04 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC SO 27 18 12 30 1.111
2002-03 Brown D1 ECAC SR 35 9 3 12 0.343
2002-03 SUNY Cortland D3 SUNYAC FR 27 6 8 14 0.518
2001-02 Brown D1 ECAC JR 28 3 2 5 0.179

NCAAe Rankings

#58918
Forward overall
#1044
Forward born in 1981
#4931
in OJHL

D1 Comparables

Ali Thomas
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.34 PPG
→ Notre Dame (0.18 D1 FR PPG)
0.18 Developing
NCAAe PPG
Tayler Munson
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.31 PPG
→ Alaska Fairbanks (0.35 D1 FR PPG)
0.17 Average
NCAAe PPG
Stanislav Dzakhov
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.27 PPG
→ Niagara (0.44 D1 FR PPG)
0.15 Average
NCAAe PPG
Ben Ostlie
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.23 PPG
→ Notre Dame
0.13 No data
NCAAe PPG
William Messa
USHL · 2012-13 · 0.21 PPG
→ Northeastern
0.12 No data
NCAAe PPG

D2/3 Comparables

Matthew Frett
Franklin Pierce · 2023-24
0.217 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Brendan Conway
St. Olaf · 2018-19
0.200 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG
Justin Giles
Wisconsin-Stout · 2008-09
0.182 Developing
actual D2/3 PPG

How to read this: NCAAe and D3e factors convert a player's junior PPG into expected NCAA scoring at the D1 or D3 level. Harder conferences → lower projected PPG for the same player. A strong junior player (e.g. USHL 0.90 PPG) will project much higher in NESCAC than Big Ten because the D3 scoring environment is lower-difficulty.

Strength factor: conferences above 1.0 are harder than average; below 1.0 are easier. The formula is: Base NCAAe PPG ÷ Conference Strength = Projected PPG.